• COVID-19 Resources
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Promotions
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • May 9, 2025

Milwaukee Courier Weekly Newspaper

"THE NEWSPAPER YOU CAN TRUST SINCE 1964"

  • News
  • Editorials
  • Education
  • Urban Business
  • Health
  • Religion
  • Upcoming Events
  • Classifieds

Share:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

DOJ Poised to Reject Abrahamson’s Lawsuit, Supreme Court Votes for New Chief Justice

May 9, 2015

By Graham Kilmer

Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson

Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson

The Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in a federal court on Monday to throw out a lawsuit filed by state Supreme Court Justice Shirley Abrahamson.

On April, 7 2015, Wisconsin voters approved an amendment to the state constitution effectively changing the 126 year-old process for selection of the chief justice.

Abrahamson filed her lawsuit the following day, which ostensibly calls for her to retain her title as chief justice.

The new method for naming the chief justice allows for the members of the Supreme Court to elect their chief justice by a majority vote.

The original rule designated the justice who had served the longest consecutive term as the chief justice.

The new amendment allowed the conservative majority on the supreme court to strip chief justice Abrahamson of her title.

Justice Patience Roggensack was voted chief justice by four other members of the high court, including herself

Justice Patience Roggensack was voted
chief justice by four other members of the
high court, including herself

On Wednesday, April 29, four members of the state Supreme Court voted via email to elect justice Patience Roggensack the new chief justice, with Roggensack casting the deciding vote

The DOJ’s recent motion calls for the federal court to dismiss the lawsuit because it fails to contend that justice Abrahamson’s constitutional rights were violated by the amendment.

In Abrahamson’s lawsuit, she requests the federal court declare her position as chief justice a “constitutionally protected interest.”

In her suit, she requested that the amendment, altering the selection process of the chief justice, only be applied if there is a vacancy in the office of the chief justice, or until her term ends in July 2019.

Abrahamson stated that the implementation of the amendment, immediately following its approval by the Wisconsin Board of Elections, was “retroactive” and a violation of her constitutional right to due process under the 14th amendment.

In the motion filed Monday by the DOJ, Attorney General Brad Schimel stated that the office of elected public officials are not a “constitutionally protected interest,” and that Wisconsin voters have the right to amend the constitutional terms regarding a public office as they did on April 7.

The motion from the DOJ also claims, because the amendment was passed by the state legislature and approved by a public vote, Abrahamson’s due process had been served.

Under Wisconsin state law, if a constitutional amendment does not specify the date it becomes effective, then it can be implemented once it is approved by a board; in this case, the Wisconsin Board of Elections.

Abrahamson also argued, because she campaigned in 2009 as the state chief justice, those that voted for her had the expectation that she would finish out her term in the position of chief justice.

She stated that the votes from the 2009 election were “diluted” by the passage of the new amendment, because they changed the result of the election.

She was joined in her suit by several registered Wisconsin voters to argue this point.

The DOJ responded in their recent motion stating that the voters had no “stake” in the suit, and also, because the amendment was ultimately passed by a public vote, the voters who passed the amendment on April 7 have rights equivalent to the rights of the voters who voted for Abrahamson in 2009, and are now plaintiffs in the suit.

Share:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Popular Interests In This Article: Brad Schimel, Graham Kilmer, Patience Roggensack, Shirley Abrahamson, Wisconsin Supreme Court

Read More - Related Articles

  • Wisconsin’s Supreme Court has Become Hyper Political. The Rise and Fall of Michael Gableman’s Career Shows how that Happened.
  • Judge Susan Crawford Wins Wisconsin Supreme Court Race in Historic, High-Stakes Election
  • Vicious Ads, Record Spending, Elon Musk: Wisconsin Supreme Court Race Reflects Nasty, New Normal
  • Supreme Court Candidate Can Kiss my Grits
  • Elon Musk Is Trying To Buy the Wisconsin Supreme Court
Become Our Fan On Facebook
Find Us On Facebook


Follow Us On X
Follow Us On X

Editorials

Lakeshia Myers
Michelle Bryant
Dr. Kweku Akyirefi Amoasi formerly known as Dr. Ramel Smith

Journalists

Karen Stokes

Topics

Health Care & Wellness
Climate Change
Upcoming Events
Obituaries
Milwaukee NAACP

Politicians

David Crowley
Cavalier Johnson
Marcelia Nicholson
Governor Tony Evers
President Joe Biden
Vice President Kamala Harris
Former President Barack Obama
Gwen Moore
Milele A. Coggs
Spencer Coggs

Classifieds

Job Openings
Bid Requests
Req Proposals
Req Quotations
Apts For Rent

Contact Us

Milwaukee Courier
2003 W. Capitol Dr.
Milwaukee, WI 53206
Ph: 414.449.4860
Fax: 414.906.5383

Copyright © 2025 · Courier Communications | View Privacy Policy | Site built and maintained by Farrell Marketing Technology LLC
We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.