• COVID-19 Resources
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Promotions
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • May 25, 2025

Milwaukee Courier Weekly Newspaper

"THE NEWSPAPER YOU CAN TRUST SINCE 1964"

  • News
  • Editorials
  • Education
  • Urban Business
  • Health
  • Religion
  • Upcoming Events
  • Classifieds
EXCEPT WHERE INDICATED, THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF THE MILWAUKEE COURIER

Share:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

The Trump Tariffs: Slimy, Swampy, Suspect

April 11, 2025

Say Something Real

By Michelle Bryant

Michelle Bryant

The Trump administration’s tariffs were designed to achieve a singular goal: fairness in international trade. But there is something about them that just seems off. While the stated ambition is laudable and arguably has merit, the path taken to achieve it has left a trail of economic turmoil, uncertainty, and global mistrust. I can’t fully put my finger on it, but it feels swampy.

You may recall in 2016, then President-elect Donald Trump’s campaign promised to “drain the swamp”, to rid Washington, D.C., of those advancing special interests. It wasn’t a new idea or the first time a politician had used the phrase. According to an article in the Public Affairs Council, “The first use of the swamp metaphor dates back to the early 20th century when the organizer of what became the Socialist Party of America said socialists “are not satisfied with killing a few of the mosquitoes … They want to drain the swamp.” However, under Trump’s leadership, then and now, the swamp is more saturated and filled with slimier folks than ever before. The tariffs are exposing the deepened cesspool. Here’s what I mean.

The financial industry, in particular, has been shaken by the ripple effects of these policies, with middle-class families and lower-income individuals bearing the brunt of the fallout. Though the recent 90-day pause on retaliatory, not reciprocal, tariffs brought a temporary reprieve and led to significant market gains, the damage—over $8 trillion in lost wealth in just one week—has left many questioning whether there was a better way to accomplish these objectives or if fair trade was the objective, at all.

One of the most controversial aspects of the tariff policy has been the influence wielded by some of the wealthiest individuals in the world. Billionaires, corporate executives, and financial elites often have the president’s ear, shaping policies that directly impact global markets. While their expertise may provide valuable insights, the optics of these interactions are troubling. For too many Americans, it appears that decisions about trade and tariffs are being made in ivory towers, far removed from the struggles of everyday citizens. This perception erodes trust in the government’s ability to act in the best interest of the broader population. There is an aspect of this, quite frankly, that seems suspect.

On April 9th, when the US markets opened, everyone was bracing for a doomsday scenario. Words like recession, volatility, and “short-term bottom” were on everyone’s mind heading into the day. Yet at 9:30 am, on social media Trump posted “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! DJT.”

For middle-class and lower-income individuals, reeling from losses, who had the money to buy stocks? The Guardian online outlet reported that Democratic senator Chris Murphy wrote on X that an “insider trading scandal is brewing … Trump’s 9:30 am tweet makes it clear he was eager for his people to make money off the private info only he knew. So, who knew ahead of time and how much money did they make?”

Then Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gets in on the game, posting “I’ve been hearing some interesting chatter on the floor. The disclosure deadline is May 15th. We’re about to learn a few things. It’s time to ban insider trading in Congress.” I share those concerns, and I have questions. In fact, we all should.

One: Was there a better way to achieve fairness in trade without nearly blowing up the system? Two: Is a five-time bankruptcy filer really the best person to be making trade decisions? Three: Who benefited the most from April 9th and who is going to ask the tough questions of this administration?

Share:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Popular Interests In This Article: Donald Trump, Michelle Bryant, Say Something Real, Tariffs

Read More - Related Articles

  • America for Sale? Luxury Over Leadership
  • South Africa’s President Asks for Answers and Contradicts Trump on White Killings
  • Tariffs, Boycotts Slam Target’s Bottom Line
  • Acquittal of Officers in Tyree Nichols’ Beating Death Hits Differently
  • First COVID, Now Tariffs: Black Businesses Need Us to Show Up!
Become Our Fan On Facebook
Find Us On Facebook


Follow Us On X
Follow Us On X

Editorials

Lakeshia Myers
Michelle Bryant
Dr. Kweku Akyirefi Amoasi formerly known as Dr. Ramel Smith

Journalists

Karen Stokes

Topics

Health Care & Wellness
Climate Change
Upcoming Events
Obituaries
Milwaukee NAACP

Politicians

David Crowley
Cavalier Johnson
Marcelia Nicholson
Governor Tony Evers
President Joe Biden
Vice President Kamala Harris
Former President Barack Obama
Gwen Moore
Milele A. Coggs
Spencer Coggs

Classifieds

Job Openings
Bid Requests
Req Proposals
Req Quotations
Apts For Rent

Contact Us

Milwaukee Courier
2003 W. Capitol Dr.
Milwaukee, WI 53206
Ph: 414.449.4860
Fax: 414.906.5383

Copyright © 2025 · Courier Communications | View Privacy Policy | Site built and maintained by Farrell Marketing Technology LLC
We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.