• COVID-19 Resources
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Promotions
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • June 6, 2025

Milwaukee Courier Weekly Newspaper

"THE NEWSPAPER YOU CAN TRUST SINCE 1964"

  • News
  • Editorials
  • Education
  • Urban Business
  • Health
  • Religion
  • Upcoming Events
  • Classifieds
EXCEPT WHERE INDICATED, THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF THE MILWAUKEE COURIER

Share:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Affirmative Action, Scalia and Race

December 19, 2015

By Gloria Browne-Marshall
AANIC Supreme Court Correspondent

Gloria J. Browne-Marshall

Gloria J. Browne-Marshall

When the divided high Court debated affirmative action, the addition of race as even one factor in college admission appeared to be too much for conservative jurist Antonin Scalia in the case of Fisher v. Texas heard again last Wednesday.

Justice Scalia questioned whether affirmative action was actually harming Black students. Abigail Fisher, a White high school student, applied to the University of Texas in 2008.

At the time, the University of Texas had an admission policy that automatically admitted the top 10 percent of all Texas high school students.

Fisher was not in the top 10 percent of her high school class.

A second tier of the Texas policy admitted students based on factors such as leadership, student achievement, family income, experiences, language spoken at home, and race.

Fisher failed the holistic review as well. She sued the university alleging race discrimination was the reason why she was not admitted.

She lost her case and appealed to the Supreme Court. That first case Fisher v. Texas (I) was heard in 2013.

It was the same year the Voting Rights Act was gutted of its protection of preclearance in Shelby v. Holder.

Many in civil rights thought it was the end of affirmative action in higher education, altogether.

However, the Court ruled in Fisher I that the university must review its plan and try to find an affirmative action policy that did not involve race.

Now, Fisher v. Texas (II) is the return of the University of Texas to the Court to explain why it is still necessary for its admissions policy to contain race as even one factor among many.

Affirmative action began in 1961 when President John F. Kennedy noted that affirmative measures or actions were needed to fight the persistence of racial discrimination.

President Lyndon Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and Executive Order 11246 which called for affirmative action in employment, the government and higher education.

But, in 1978, the University of California was sued by Allen Bakke, a White, 35 year-old medical school applicant, who alleged the school’s affirmative action policy violated his Equal Protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Court agreed and ruled race could only be a factor in admissions, striking down all quotas as unconstitutional.

College admission committees, concerned over “reverse discrimination” lawsuits, began dismantling their affirmative action plans.

In 1995, the University of Michigan was sued by Jennifer Gratz and the university’s law school was sued by Barbara Grutter.

The Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. Bollinger that the use of race must be used narrowly and then limited the need for it to 25 years.

Last week, Chief Justice John Roberts turned to attorney Gregory G. Garre, for the university, and asked, “Is this going to be done in twelve years?” Garre responded “In 2004 the university had 272 African-Americans out of a class of 8,000.”

It was at this point that Justice Scalia questioned whether affirmative action was actually harming Black students.

Scalia said, “It does not benefit African-Americans to get them into the University of Texas where they do not do well.”

He suggested that they attend “less advanced schools” or “slower track” schools because most of the Black scientists don’t come from schools like the University of Texas. Blacks would be better off, he said, testily.

“Maybe the university ought to have fewer Black students,” Scalia added. The conservatives on the Court made their impatience with affirmative action clear.

Even as Garre explained, “There are systematic problems this policy is attempting to address.”

Chief Justice Roberts said pointedly, this was meant to be a necessary but temporary policy. The case will be decided by June.

Gloria J. Browne- Marshall is an associate professor of constitutional law at John Jay College (CUNY). She is the author of Race, Law, and American Society: 1607 to present (Routledge) and the Supreme Court correspondent for AANIC (African- American News & Information Consortium). Twitter: @GBrowneMarshall

Share:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Popular Interests In This Article: Gloria J. Browne-Marshall

Read More - Related Articles

  • Law of the Land
  • Clarence Thomas is in Trouble – Again
  • Charge Buffalo Massacre Defendant Under Anti-Lynching Law
  • “SHOT” – The Drama of InJustice
  • “Electoral College Drama Ahead – Pence Must Announce Biden Wins”
Become Our Fan On Facebook
Find Us On Facebook


Follow Us On X
Follow Us On X

Editorials

Lakeshia Myers
Michelle Bryant
Dr. Kweku Akyirefi Amoasi formerly known as Dr. Ramel Smith

Journalists

Karen Stokes

Topics

Health Care & Wellness
Climate Change
Upcoming Events
Obituaries
Milwaukee NAACP

Politicians

David Crowley
Cavalier Johnson
Marcelia Nicholson
Governor Tony Evers
President Joe Biden
Vice President Kamala Harris
Former President Barack Obama
Gwen Moore
Milele A. Coggs
Spencer Coggs

Classifieds

Job Openings
Bid Requests
Req Proposals
Req Quotations
Apts For Rent

Contact Us

Milwaukee Courier
2003 W. Capitol Dr.
Milwaukee, WI 53206
Ph: 414.449.4860
Fax: 414.906.5383

Copyright © 2025 · Courier Communications | View Privacy Policy | Site built and maintained by Farrell Marketing Technology LLC
We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.