“Net Neutrality” counter productive for broadband expansion
A lack of computer and internet skills – now more than ever – can be a barrier to receiving a good education or obtaining a good-paying, family- supporting job in Wisconsin and across the country.
Because of the increased emphasis on the Internet for communication and research, it’s essential that we – as a nation – do everything in our power to ensure that highspeed, broadband internet access is available from coast-to-coast, in every corner of the country, and particularly in urban and minority areas.
But the continued expansion of broadband internet is very much in jeopardy as Congress and decision makers in Washington debate new so-called “net neutrality” rules.
“Net neutrality” refers to the idea that there should be no restrictions on web content or access – which in and of itself doesn’t sound like a bad idea.
But the whole idea behind “net neutrality” is a solution in search of a problem. Everyone, including us, supports an open Internet, but the rules proposed by the Federal Communications Commission do more harm than good and will actually strangle the Internet. If there’s a problem, and that’s a big if, this isn’t the solution.
New internet technologies are being rapidly developed, online content is more expansive than ever, and more and more people are connecting to the internet – particularly wirelessly – every day.
This is especially true of African Americans, nearly half of whom use mobile devices, compared to the national average of just 32 percent. Impoverished areas are also enjoying a rapid increase in the adoption of broadband internet, with a 34 percent growth rate from 2008 to 2009 among households with less than $30,000 in annual income.
This is – in part – due to a healthy level of competition among internet providers and wireless companies, resulting in better services and more affordable prices for lower income families.
These trends are good for urban and minority areas of the country like Milwaukee. The faster broadband internet is adopted in inner-city areas, the more adults and children will have the opportunity to gain the computer and internet skills necessary to compete in the job market.
But if new “net neutrality” rules were to pass, and unnecessary regulations were placed on internet providers, the result would be a dramatic slow-down in the expansion of broadband infrastructure. Prices would also likely rise, making it increasingly harder for urban citizens to gain access to and afford high-speed internet services.
Given the tough economic times we live in, we need to be encouraging broadband access and lower prices – not fighting against them.
The system of internet regulation is working as it should, and the expansion of internet services is growing at a healthy pace. It’s critically important – now more than ever – that those in Washington allow this progress to continue, rather than grinding it to a halt with unnecessary “net neutrality” regulations.
Read More! - Related Articles:
Popular Interests In This Article: Broadband Internet, Computer Skills, Federal Communications Commission, Internet Regulation, Net Neutrality



Why?
Why are you saying that rules keeping the internet open to a free voice and a single charge for a single service (Net Neutrality) are hindering an entirely seperate thing – infrastructure build-out?
Why do rules that prohibit the last mile carrier’s rights to censor and “double charge” under a new scheme not yet in use for the internet threaten broadband expansion?
And why has AT&T alone (Comcast perhaps just as much) spent a reported $740M for lobbying activities since 2006 including setting up dubious activites here in Wisconsin (false internet advocacy groups)?
Could it be to set up this argument that you are stating here without any reason as to why broadband development is threated (you didn’t give one) execpt that AT&T wants to write its own rules whereby they can legally “take” a second fee for the same wire that they’ve always had to bring you the last mile of the internet?
No answers?
It’s time the people and the law makers in this state realize that this argument is coming from those who have something to gain – only from AT&T, Comcast and the last mile internet providers who have already profited hansomly from the internet which was originally established by the US taxpayer though the Dept. of Defense. (They can afford vast wealth on these lobbying efforts – now can’t they!)
So to the “journalist” who wrote this article, the Milwaukee Courier and the press at large, I ask you… Why does Net Neutrality hurt broadband expansion? (because AT&T doesn’t like it? – have some integrity to report this story correctly!)
I apologize to the Milwaukee Courier staff for my last comment. I see now that -“Net Neutrality” counter productive for broadband expansion- is an opinion editorial and not a reported story.
So, I will redirect my question regarding “why” to the seemingly anonymous submitter of the editorial. Why?
And, now, why anonymous?
Again, my apologies to the Courier.
Connect With Us
Follow Us On Twitter
Advertise
Sections
Popular Interests